On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not starting an emergency session might have been a good way to allow
> more judges to be active to handle cases.
The Emergency Session ended days ago; non-Senators can sit up.
root wrote:
> If you want to find a way to improve the appeal system, I suggest
> trying to find ways to significantly reduce the number of appeal cases
> that are getting initiated in the first place. Right now we seem to
> be generating more cases than we can really handle, which I think is
> wh
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I considered keeping out the CotC, but I thought that in a
> highly controversial issue a simple majority wasn't enough to
> represent actual consensus. I wanted to be sure the judgement was
> actually acceptable to ever
On Saturday 14 June 2008 1:51:51 Alexander Smith wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal, "Intractable cases", AI=2, II=2:
> AFAICT that would end up causing double-appealed cases to require
> unanimous support from everyone, unless for some reason the CotC was
> ineligible to j
Pavitra wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Intractable cases", AI=2, II=2:
AFAICT that would end up causing double-appealed cases to require unanimous
support from everyone, unless for some reason the CotC was ineligible to judge
them, under the currently-being-voted-on change to appeal s
5 matches
Mail list logo
