On Saturday 14 June 2008 1:51:51 Alexander Smith wrote: > Pavitra wrote: > > I submit the following proposal, "Intractable cases", AI=2, II=2: > AFAICT that would end up causing double-appealed cases to require > unanimous support from everyone, unless for some reason the CotC was > ineligible to judge them, under the currently-being-voted-on change > to appeal support. This is surely not a good idea; even proposals > pass more easily than that. > -- > ais523 >
Well, I considered keeping out the CotC, but I thought that in a highly controversial issue a simple majority wasn't enough to represent actual consensus. I wanted to be sure the judgement was actually acceptable to everyone. I don't like this judicial ping-pong we have right now, where everyone's just waiting to see who will have the ball when the tension finally breaks and a panel rules decisively. You're right about proposals, though. I don't know what to do there. Pavitra
