On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:27 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not against the best interests of the game to allow this crazy
> forum to have been Public, because as far as I know the actions taken
> in it while it was a Public Forum are well-known. So I judge CFJ 2211
> TRUE, and submit
root wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>
>>> It is not against the best interests of the game to allow this crazy
>>> forum to have been Public, because as far as I know the actions taken
>>> in it while it was a Public Forum are well-k
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
>> It is not against the best interests of the game to allow this crazy
>> forum to have been Public, because as far as I know the actions taken
>> in it while it was a Public Forum are well-known. So I judge CFJ
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I doubt that agoranomic.org is any less vulnerable than freenode to a
> DoS attack. Your conclusion seems reasonable, though.
I'm talking about flood control-- it only takes a few repeated
messages to have freenode slow you d
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although it is reasonable in theory for ais523 to intend to
> cause fora changes in a report, e ought to have done it near the forum
> section; sticking the intent in the registration history is
> unreasonable.
I would think it wo
== CFJ 2211 ==
It is POSSIBLE to perform game actions via the #really-a-cow
forum.
There are two reasons why the outcome of this CFJ could be FALSE:
either the
6 matches
Mail list logo
