On Nov 29, 2007 12:56 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may
> also start including some "holdings as of " sections, so
> that those can be cleaned up and ratified even while more recent points
> of contention continue to be examined.
That's basically what I was planning to proto; I don'
root wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 10:20 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Kelly wrote:
The Truthkeepor is an office;
Insert "low-priority".
The inspiration for this was that it's getting to be difficult to
remember what the self-ratification status is for each VC report,
especially s
On Nov 29, 2007 10:20 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Kelly wrote:
> > The Truthkeepor is an office;
>
> Insert "low-priority".
The inspiration for this was that it's getting to be difficult to
remember what the self-ratification status is for each VC report,
especially since they
Ian Kelly wrote:
> The Truthkeepor is an office;
Insert "low-priority".
> The Truthkeepor's report is self-ratifying.
Ontological problems ahoy. Better not, I think.
-zefram
Proto: The Truthkeepor
Create a new rule titled "The Truthkeepor", reading:
The Truthkeepor is an office; its holder is responsible for
tracking the ratifications of official documents.
The Truthkeepor's report includes, for each official document
ratified within the prev
5 matches
Mail list logo
