G. wrote:
If a rule with higher power defers to a rule of lower power, and the
deference is allowed to work, then the lower powered rule could be
modified (using an instrument of a lower power) to do something else,
thus modifying the operation of the higher-powered rule with a lower-
powered ch
If a rule with higher power defers to a rule of lower power, and the
deference is allowed to work, then the lower powered rule could be
modified (using an instrument of a lower power) to do something else,
thus modifying the operation of the higher-powered rule with a lower-
powered change.
This
G., can you explain why it's that way?
-Aris
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Why would anyone intend that? It doesn't make any sense.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> "Reading it's text, if a rule of higher power defers
>> to a rule of low
Why would anyone intend that? It doesn't make any sense.
-Aris
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> "Reading it's text, if a rule of higher power defers
> to a rule of lower power, the rule of higher power is followed anyway."
> Pretty sure that's intentional.
>
> On Sat, Sep 9, 201
"Reading it's text, if a rule of higher power defers
to a rule of lower power, the rule of higher power is followed anyway."
Pretty sure that's intentional.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I know that this is one of the scariest, if not the scariest, game
> mechanics to fid
I know that this is one of the scariest, if not the scariest, game
mechanics to fiddle with. That being said, Rule 1030 is pretty
obviously broken. Reading it's text, if a rule of higher power defers
to a rule of lower power, the rule of higher power is followed anyway.
This fixes that and a few ot
6 matches
Mail list logo
