On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> I think that the dealer is culpable (be careful who you trust), and the
> actor is culpable iff the contract granting act-on-behalf makes em so
> ("e SHALL NOT cause the dealer to take ILLEGAL actions").
proto: cards website sends message
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
>> interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
>> earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
>> interface (such
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
>> interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
>> earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
> interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
> earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
> interface (such as the ones I just sent
FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
interface (such as the ones I just sent from the Deck of Justice)
because they are alread
5 matches
Mail list logo