On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Benjamin
Caplan<celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that the dealer is culpable (be careful who you trust), and the
> actor is culpable iff the contract granting act-on-behalf makes em so
> ("e SHALL NOT cause the dealer to take ILLEGAL actions").proto: cards website sends message to the PF From: the actor, announcing that e MAY and IS acting on behalf of the dealor; then truthiness comes into play.
