Re: DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-09 Thread Grey Knight
--- Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/8/06, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:42:22AM -0700, Grey Knight wrote: > > > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready > is > > > ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mea

DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
GreyKnight wrote: If we rule that: (a) All players that were active when 4866 was adopted are considered active for the purpose of any rule which refers to activity. (b) All players that were inactive when 4866 was adopted are considered inactive for any such rule until they next participate

Re: DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Ian Kelly
On 10/8/06, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:42:22AM -0700, Grey Knight wrote: > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is > ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ > 1590 is FALSE. I *think* you may need to

Re: DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Michael Slone
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:42:22AM -0700, Grey Knight wrote: > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is > ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ > 1590 is FALSE. I *think* you may need to publish your decision (that is, post it to a public for

Re: DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Grey Knight
--- Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/8/06, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is > > ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ > > 1590 is FALSE. > > > > (That rule quote is taken from the

Re: DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Ian Kelly
On 10/8/06, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ 1590 is FALSE. (That rule quote is taken from the September SLR, but I can't see anywhere where that rule has

DIS: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1589 assigned to GreyKnight

2006-10-08 Thread Grey Knight
--- Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1589 > CFJ 1589 > Quazie is inactive. > > Caller's Arguments: > > Proposal 4866 repealed Rule 1016 (Activity Levels) without declaring > all players active. > > Quazie was inactive as of the Reg