Roger Hicks wrote:
>What permits the BobTHJ-in-Vote-Market position to deregister?
Its playerhood, which is tied to the BobTHJ aspect.
-zefram
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> We have here a moral, not a factual, decision. Either choice makes sense;
> which one is _right_?
The general practice is that if two decisions are equally, or close to
similarly "reasonable", then we defer to the judge's call. That is, a
hypothetical App
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If the agent of Registrar (through Cantus Cygneus) doesn't
> > >satisfy, neither would the agent of a deputy.
> >
> > Nice point. Its validity comes down to the question of how much
> > BobTHJness is e
> > If the agent of Registrar (through Cantus Cygneus) doesn't
> >satisfy, neither would the agent of a deputy.
>
> Nice point. Its validity comes down to the question of how much
> BobTHJness is entailed in the position that I was deputising for.
> As noted above, I think there wa
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> == CFJ 1895 ==
>>BobTHJ is an R2160 'position'
...
>This Court finds FALSE.
Good analysis.
>> == CFJ 1899 ==
>>BobTHJ CAN register.
...
>First, I offer
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A set of proto-judgements...
I suggest you resubmit the first as a thesis for a D.N.Phil.
[I have substantially changed my opinion as a result of the recent
conversations]
A set of proto-judgements...
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 1895 ==
>BobTHJ is an R2160 'position'
Agora, by long tradition, is fundam
7 matches
Mail list logo
