On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, hal...@safiria.net wrote:
In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of intent
to become a player of Agora Nomic.
(Also, where relevant, I am a he.)
Welcome to Agora! (Well, once you resend it to the proper place.)
I don't think it's ever offici
Welcome, Hālian! As G. already pointed out, you need to send this to the
agora-business mailing list in order for it to take effect. Either way,
welcome to Agora Nomic.
On 10/18/2018 7:15 AM, hal...@safiria.net wrote:
In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
inten
Hi Hālian, you need to send this message to the business email
list , which is defined as a "public"
forum. agora-discussion is defined as a "discussion" forum where
messages have no effect.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, hal...@safiria.net wrote:
> In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby
Hello and Welcome to Agora!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 05:15 wrote:
> In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
> intent to become a player of Agora Nomic.
>
> (Also, where relevant, I am a he.)
>
In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
intent to become a player of Agora Nomic.
(Also, where relevant, I am a he.)
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:51 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Charles Walker :
> > You could say something along the lines of
> > 'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of
> > Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without
> > 3 or
Well I don't actually play Agora so I wouldn't know. I'ts probably better to
change the Ambassador rule.
C-walker
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> This X should probably be an office, but I'm not sure which one: first
> I thought the natural choice would be the Ambassador
2009/3/23 Charles Walker :
> You could say something along the lines of
> 'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of
> Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without
> 3 or more objections, perform those actions.'
This X should probably be a
You should keep it general, but you need to mention who is going to vote on
Agora's behalf as the liaison. You could say something along the lines of
'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of
Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without
3
So, if I want to make a proposal about us joining IN2, how should I
word it? Is referring to another nomic in the rules a good idea, or
should they be kept general?
10 matches
Mail list logo
