On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:51 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/3/23 Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com>: > > You could say something along the lines of > > 'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of > > Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without > > 3 or more objections, perform those actions.' > This X should probably be an office, but I'm not sure which one: first > I thought the natural choice would be the Ambassador, but then I saw > that "Diplomatic missions from Agora to foreign > nomics operate on the Speaker's behalf." So should it be the Speaker? It should be the Ambassador acting on behalf of the Speaker, obviously.
-- ais523 who is both the Ambassador and the Speaker
