Re: DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread comex
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there > should be only five MwPs.  I have the most recent winners as follows: > > 02/27/09 comex > 02/05/09 Murphy > 02/03/09 ais523, AFO > 12/03/08 Pavitra > 10/31/08 ais523 > 10/27/08

Re: DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:21 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > Sgeo wrote: > > > Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after > > ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523 > > gains Speakership. > > Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocat

Re: DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread Sgeo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo wrote: > Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after > ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523 > gains Speakership. > Nevermind, forgot about Murphy's win.

Re: DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after > ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523 > gains Speakership. Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocations platonically occurred due to Rule 1922 (causing Rule 649 to r

Re: DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after > ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523 > gains Speakership. I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there should be only five MwPs. I have the most recent winners as

DIS: I think I was mistaken about the MwPs.

2009-02-28 Thread Sgeo
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523 gains Speakership.