On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 16:26, Arkady English
> wrote:
> > On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> >> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
> >>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
> Agora cannot play Blo
> I suppose this might depend on what BlogNomic considers Agora being a
> player of it to consist of. In Agora, legal (second-class) persons
> have to meet certain criteria and can only act as defined by the
> Rules. Does BlogNomic allow legal persons to play, or have certain
> restrictions in plac
I'm a blognomic player.
Our rules state that "anybody" can be a player. To me, at least, a
game is not "anybody", but this question of interpretation would
likely be settled by CFJ.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 16:10, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 11
On 11 August 2011 16:10, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 17:03, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in
>>> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to
>>>
On 11 August 2011 17:03, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in
>> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to
>> be about: the guy who was entrusted to hang out in oth
On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in
> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to
> be about: the guy who was entrusted to hang out in other countries and
> know what the people back home wou
On 11 August 2011 16:26, Arkady English wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
>>> wrote:
Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
allowing it to; the
On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
>>> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
>>>
>>
On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
>> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
>>
> Well, obviously the game of agora, now an entity capable o
On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
>
Well, obviously the game of agora, now an entity capable of taking
action within itself, couldn't really do such a
Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
I tried to register Agora as a player of BlogNomic a few minutes ago,
but didn't think the e-mail adress through very well. First I tried my
own address, since I will be playing on Agora's behalf anyway, but it
was taken since I registered myself a long time ago. I then entered
agora-discussion whi
12 matches
Mail list logo
