I'm a blognomic player. Our rules state that "anybody" can be a player. To me, at least, a game is not "anybody", but this question of interpretation would likely be settled by CFJ.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 August 2011 16:10, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11 August 2011 17:03, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in >>>> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to >>>> be about: the guy who was entrusted to hang out in other countries and >>>> know what the people back home would want him to say. >>>> >>>> /Tiger >>>> >>> >>> In that case we would need a rule allowing the Ambassador to act on >>> Agora's behalf in other nomics. At the moment there simply isn't a >>> mechanism which allows it to act at all. >>> >> So this: >> >> When the office of Ambassador first becomes filled, the holder >> SHALL as soon as possible attempt to cause Agora to become a >> player of BlogNomic. >> >> is kind of pointless? It allows for me to cause Agora to become a >> player, rather than ruling that Agora should become a player, so this >> far it's explicitly me on behalf of it. But yeah, there's nothing at >> all about Agora taking actions elsewhere, now that it is a player >> there. >> >> /Tiger >> > > I suppose this might depend on what BlogNomic considers Agora being a > player of it to consist of. In Agora, legal (second-class) persons > have to meet certain criteria and can only act as defined by the > Rules. Does BlogNomic allow legal persons to play, or have certain > restrictions in place? > > -- > Charles Walker >
