On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I don't have the time right now to get a better judgment out. I
>> thought I was basically just going with the first of you three
>> reasonable interpretations? Anyhow, I'm going to make this the
Keep imo.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I don't have the time right now to get a better judgment out. I
>> thought I was basically just going with the first of you three
>> reasonable interpretations? Anyhow, I'm going to ma
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I don't have the time right now to get a better judgment out. I
> thought I was basically just going with the first of you three
> reasonable interpretations? Anyhow, I'm going to make this the
> judgment. If the Agoran public is unhappy, they can REMAN
I don't have the time right now to get a better judgment out. I
thought I was basically just going with the first of you three
reasonable interpretations? Anyhow, I'm going to make this the
judgment. If the Agoran public is unhappy, they can REMAND or REMIT
it, otherwise the judgment will stand. I
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I will make this judgment formal tomorrow if no one has any
> objections/corrections to it.
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
> CFJ 3557 (on Motion to Reconsider)
I suspect we have a fundamental disagreement on Rules reading, so at this
point,
the most appropriate
I will make this judgment formal tomorrow if no one has any
objections/corrections to it.
-Aris
---
CFJ 3557 (on Motion to Reconsider)
[Addendum to my previous verdict, available here [1]]
There is some question as to whether precedent supports the idea that
"SHALL" implies "CAN by announcement
6 matches
Mail list logo
