comex wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "A Ticket is an allegation that an entity (the Accused) has broken a
>> Rule, published by a player, and specifying all of:"
>
> Is there a good reason to switch from old-style Notice of Violation?
Shorter.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "A Ticket is an allegation that an entity (the Accused) has broken a
> Rule, published by a player, and specifying all of:"
Is there a good reason to switch from old-style Notice of Violation?
Goethe wrote:
> Create a power-2 rule called "Rests" with the following text:
>
> Rests are a fixed asset, whose recordkeepor is the Conductor.
> The creation and destruction of Rests is secured with a power
> threshold of 1.7, a player generally CANNOT destroy rests
> excep
> Amend Rule 1504 to read:
> There is a subclass of judicial case known as a criminal case.
> Any first-class person can initiate a criminal case by an
> announcement calling for judgement on the circumstances
> surrounding a specified valid Notice of Violation alleging a
>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rests are a fixed asset, whose recordkeepor is the Conductor.
> The creation and destruction of Rests is secured with a power
> threshold of 1.7, a player generally CANNOT destroy rests
> except as permitted b
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> Players can only buy rests off other players (and so not non-players) in
> your proto: in mine, players could only buy rests off themselves, and
> non-players can't own Notes, so they'd have to sit there until the rests
> decayed.
Ah, that's a good catch.
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 07:10 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:05, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>While a player owns at least 24 Rests, that player CAN be
> >>deregistered by any player by announcement. A person s
On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:05, Kerim Aydin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While a player owns at least 24 Rests, that player CAN be
deregistered by any player by announcement. A person so
deregiste
On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:05, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
While a player owns at least 24 Rests, that player CAN be
deregistered by any player by announcement. A person so
deregistered CANNOT re-register for 60 days followi
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:05, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>While a player owns at least 24 Rests, that player CAN be
>>deregistered by any player by announcement. A person so
>>deregistered CANNOT re-register for 60 days following
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:05, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>While a player owns at least 24 Rests, that player CAN be
>deregistered by any player by announcement. A person so
>deregistered CANNOT re-register for 60 days following eir
>deregistration, rules to the contrar
Proto: Criminal Reform
ais523 is the coauthor of this proposal
[Summary:
New, simpler criminal process:
* Rests are the new blots.
* Streamlined Process: Accuser issues a Notice of Violation. If
notice is uncontested for 4 days, the accused automatically gets
Rests = pow
12 matches
Mail list logo
