I’ll volunteer for notary.
Gaelan
> On Jan 16, 2020, at 8:50 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> They're just so minimal and lightweight that getting rid of them feels
> like a tragedy.
>
> Also, any takers for Notary?
>
> -Aris
>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:31 PM James C
Sure, I don't mind keeping pledges, at least while your new system is
still untested.
I probably shouldn't take on Notary now, but in 2-3 months I may have
more time, especially if Gaelan successfully takes over Registrar.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 04:50, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
They're just so minimal and lightweight that getting rid of them feels
like a tragedy.
Also, any takers for Notary?
-Aris
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:31 PM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 01:24, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Amend rule 2450, "Pledges", by adding at
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 01:24, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Amend rule 2450, "Pledges", by adding at the end of the first paragraph
> "A pledge ceases to exist at the end of its time window."
Do we still need pledges? I think a one-party contract with a
provision that the party won't
Gaelan's comments made me think of a way to tear out pacts completely.
It's a bit less backwards compatible, but also vastly simplified.
-Aris
---
Title: Contract Patency v3
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: Gaelan, Jason Cobb, Falsifian
Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
5 matches
Mail list logo