Per my usual custom, I voted via private email to the Speaker (and my
votes were correctly recorded for 342-343 and 345-347). Fool's report does
have Walker listed as voting against, so if he just switched my vote with
Walker's, that doesn't affect passage of the proposal, but does affect
points.
Given that Charles Walker did vote FOR, it doesn't matter if Chuck did vote
AGAINST.
On 28 June 2013 00:00, Steven Gardner wrote:
> Charles Walker voted FOR and his vote is not recorded; Speaker Fool may
> have confused the two 'Charles's. I've no record of Chuck voting on this
> proposal public
Charles Walker voted FOR and his vote is not recorded; Speaker Fool may
have confused the two 'Charles's. I've no record of Chuck voting on this
proposal publically, but e may of course have done so privately.
On 27 June 2013 23:48, wrote:
> > Proposal 344 (Yally) passes 5:3 with ehird, Steve, M
> Proposal 344 (Yally) passes 5:3 with ehird, Steve, Michael, Yally, and
> Chuck FOR; Walker, Goethe, and omd AGAINST. This amends rule 343. It
> basically restores this poor rule to the original winning condition
> (most points), and adds a clause to resume the game next year. Yally
> gets 10 poin
4 matches
Mail list logo
