Re: DIS: [Fwd: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.]

2009-10-20 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> FYI: B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality. (I was >> trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't >> discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.) > > I'd

Re: DIS: [Fwd: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.]

2009-10-20 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > FYI:  B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality.  (I was > trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't > discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.) I'd argue that if the Admira

DIS: [Fwd: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.]

2009-10-20 Thread Ed Murphy
FYI: B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality. (I was trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.) Original Message Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:10:30 + From: 0x44