Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sean Hunt > wrote: === CFJ 2890 (Interest Index = 0) It is generally POSSIBLE for me to make a proposal Undistributable for a fee. ===

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Side note:  When I proposed this, I thought for a while about sneaking > an "only" between "CAN" and "perform" for the final draft and hoping > no-one noticed it would shut off all other ways of doing things > associated with a fee.  Didn't, th

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, omd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > As "forbidden" is not defined as directly associated with a particular > > MMI mode, and (in general English) could be applied to either CAN or SHALL, > > I'd say context is important.  In this case, the "o

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd wrote: > > I intend to appeal this with two support.  Making a proposal > > undistributable modifies information for which some player is required > > to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from doing it except

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd wrote: > I intend to appeal this with two support.  Making a proposal > undistributable modifies information for which some player is required > to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from doing it except as > allowed by the rules. > > Evidence: > >      e)