pikhq wrote:
I note that this does not fulfill that obligation; the agreement does not come
into effect for a week.
Does "previous" refer to the time the agreement was published, or the
time it goes into effect? Oh well, I'll transfer another Orange Mark
next week just to be safe.
Levi wrote:
I also note that the judgement comes into effect as a binding agreement,
but, by Rule 101, it can't be forced upon someone, so what if Murphy
refused to become a party to the judgement agreement? Is that possible?
I'm pretty sure that intent to have the contract governed by the ru
Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
Of these, I think that the requirement to transfer some other sort of
Mark is the most equitable. Therefore, I make the following judgement:
"Murphy SHALL transfer a mark of some color he possesses as soon as
possible. To encourage em to do this, he MAY NOT do any
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:59:51 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > Of these, I think that the requirement to transfer some other sort of Mark
is
> > the most equitable. Therefore, I make the following judgement:
> > "Murphy SHALL transfer a mark of some color he possesses as soon as
poss
4 matches
Mail list logo
