Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
Also, wasn't the original CFJ appealed? Or did the attempt to appeal it
go wrong somehow?
>>> coppro intended to appeal and only got 1 sup
ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>> Also, wasn't the original CFJ appealed? Or did the attempt to appeal it
>>> go wrong somehow?
>> coppro intended to appeal and only got 1 support.
>
> Oops, I meant t
ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:33 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Fine. But I still think I deserve a win from this, so I CFJ on the
>> following sentence. It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir
>> report with the date the report is being submitted, not the date eir
>> previo
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Fine. But I still think I deserve a win from this, so I CFJ on the
>> following sentence. It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir report
>> with the date the report is being submitted, not the date eir previous
>> report was submitted.
>
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Also, wasn't the original CFJ appealed? Or did the attempt to appeal it
> > go wrong somehow?
>
> coppro intended to appeal and only got 1 support.
Oops, I meant to support that too.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Also, wasn't the original CFJ appealed? Or did the attempt to appeal it
> go wrong somehow?
coppro intended to appeal and only got 1 support.
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 13:44 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Fine. But I still think I deserve a win from this, so I CFJ on the
> > following sentence. It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir report
> > with the date the report
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:33 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Fine. But I still think I deserve a win from this, so I CFJ on the
> following sentence. It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir
> report with the date the report is being submitted, not the date eir
> previous report was submitt
8 matches
Mail list logo
