Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alex Smith<ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> Also, wasn't the original CFJ appealed? Or did the attempt to appeal it
>>>> go wrong somehow?
>>> coppro intended to appeal and only got 1 support.
>> Oops, I meant to support that too. (Or was it me who was that one
>> support?)
>
> Hmm, maybe the subject line got changed? I haven't been recording
> incomplete appeals since it was changed to With 2 Support (players
> used to appeal a case individually, but the case was only appealed
> upon the third such action).
No, I simply replied to it (it's the only message from me to contain
both "UNDECIDABLE" and "appeal" in its body). No one's supported my
other appeal intents either (on the Test Subject) judgments, despite me
drawing attention to them.
