I wrote:
> Ah ok, gotcha. (I wasn't particularly invested in this to be clear, just
> saw an opportunity and took it. Mostly in this for Cuddles' voting
> strength)
And also the opportunity to send a message with the subject line "OFF:
[Prime Minister] humble agoran farmer distributes proposal 834
G. wrote:
> It means that someone tried it (I wasn't the first I don't think) and
> there was some discussion and everyone involved agreed it worked and
> no-one offered any counterarguments worthy of a CFJ. And it was tried a
> time or two after that before CFJ 3688 with same results. I'll see i
On 3/1/2020 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 3/1/2020 7:54 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
>>> provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
>>
On 3/1/2020 7:54 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
>> provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
>> of any power prohibit the same action from the of
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 10:54, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
> > provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
> > of any power prohibit the same action
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
> provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
> of any power prohibit the same action from the officeholder:
> 2. it would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the
6 matches
Mail list logo
