G. wrote: > It means that someone tried it (I wasn't the first I don't think) and > there was some discussion and everyone involved agreed it worked and > no-one offered any counterarguments worthy of a CFJ. And it was tried a > time or two after that before CFJ 3688 with same results. I'll see if I > can find the first time it happened (2017-ish IIRC) but if someone has a > cogent CFJ that can always overrule.
Ah ok, gotcha. (I wasn't particularly invested in this to be clear, just saw an opportunity and took it. Mostly in this for Cuddles' voting strength) I think this means: - CuddleBeam is Speaker (and therefore not a valid PM candidate) - PM is vacant - I am Laureled if nobody has any more complaints? -twg
