On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 29 March 2012 15:53, Mister Snuggles wrote:
>> you have found me.
>
> Hey, there's still three people you could be.
>
> (It's not me.)
as far as i know, all of my messages sent to agora, whether from thi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Here are the players who deregistered after #1 (the starred ones were
> recent enough for #2 to be blocked by Rule 869's 30-day limit)
hnng
i forgot about that. my registration attempt failed.
the game is up. you have found
at the message's sender is a first-class person. :>
do you want me to make it relevant?
mister snuggles
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby register.
> I declare an intent to sit without objection.
> I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule
> 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on
> Monday.} with {Agora
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
> coe: i should not be on this list.
>
> mister snuggles
can we get these fake mister snuggles messages filtered somehow?
everyone shouldn't have to look at the headers to see who is who.
mister snuggles
; Walker
> Wooble
coe: i should not be on this list.
mister snuggles
also,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:06 PM, woggle wrote:
> I initiate a criminal case accusing mister snuggles of violating rule
> 2170 making a public statement intended to mislead others as to the
> identity of the publisher, namely the above quoted message.
not guilty, since i did not
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
> arkady hereby goes idle.
> ais523 hereby goes idle.
> benu hereby goes idle.
> g. hereby goes idle.
> murphy hereby goes idle.
> omd hereby goes idle.
> pavitra hereby goes idle.
> pikhq hereby goes idle.
> roujo
i support this proposal wholeheartedly.
mister snuggles
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:03 PM, omd wrote:
> Proposal: A controversial proposal (AI=2)
>
> Amend Rule 869 by appending to the end of the paragraph starting with
> "A first-class person":
>
> (Prima facie,
ning. Any distinction
> between unknown and unclear was rejected when Agora first opined on
> AGAINT.
g. is judging that the second meaning of "ambiguous" is the relevant one.
(now, what would happen if i said, "every first-class player calls a
cfj on ..."? that would be silly.)
mister snuggles
may we have cfj 3105 reassigned? thanks!
mister snuggles
i vote against proposals 7125-7134.
<3
mister snuggles
arly specifying the action and announcing that e performs
> it.
>
> Especially in light of these cases, I argue that the scope of
> "unambiguously and clearly" includes "announcing that e performs
> it", and that the identity of Mister Snuggles is substantiall
13 matches
Mail list logo
