On Oct 20, 2011 9:25 PM, "Ed Murphy" <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Gratuitous on 3105-06: > > Rule 478, relevant excerpt: > > Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by > announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously > and clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs > it. > > Especially in light of these cases, I argue that the scope of > "unambiguously and clearly" includes "announcing that e performs > it", and that the identity of Mister Snuggles is substantially > ambiguous due to non-trivial knock-on effects (e.g. if Mister > Snuggles initiated a judicial case, then is ais523 eligible to > judge it?).
gratuitous: my identity is unambiguous, because only one person has ever used this e-mail address. all interpretations of "mister snuggles" are objectively wrong, save one. unknown is not the same thing as ambiguous. mister snuggles
