ID: 7689 Against
ID: 7688 Present
Chester Mealer
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:36 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Henri Bouchard
> wrote:
> > ID: 7688
> > Salary is a non-singleton Switch tracked by the IADoP.
> Doesn't satisfy R2162 a)
I vote AGAINST all proposals on which I am able to vote.
Chester Mealer
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> 7685 2omd Allow Resigning the Speakership
>>
> AGAINST
>
> 7686 3omd Cleanup
>>
> FOR
>
>> 7687 1HenriDeregistration
>>
> FOR
>
>
>
If I can object to a single name, I object to my own (cdm014), otherwise I
object to the entire motion.
cdm014
On Jul 17, 2014 7:27 PM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
> I intend to deregister the following players in four days:
>
> Bayushi
> cdm014
> Fool
> Khoyo
> Walker
> woggle
> Liberon
> Yally
>
t; On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Chester Mealer wrote:
> >> I resume my identity as cdm014 with all rights and responsibilities to
> agora associated with that identity.
> >> Chester Mealer
>
was in existence a the time this inquiry was called.
Chester Mealer
cdm...@gmail.com
I cast the following votes as many times as I am allowed
6086 AGAINST
6087 AGAINST
6088 FOR
6089 FOR
6090 AGAINST
6091 FOR
6092 AGAINST
6093 AGAINST
6094 FOR
6095 AGAINST
6096 AGAINST
6097 AGAINST
6098 AGAINST
6099 AGAINST
6100 AGAINST
6101 AGAINST
6102 AGAINST
6103 FOR
6104 FOR
6105 AGAINST
6106
My message of deregistering apparently was not received. It is however in my
sent e-mail. Hmmm... there might be something interesting in that.
-cdm014
I had posted a message indicating my intent to deregister. Assuming my
deregistering was successful, I don't know why it wouldn't be, I would need
to register again.
--cdm014
the
announcements made by the partnership.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah I'm beginning to see how far over my head I was.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
y consent of all shares,
> > where a share is considered to consent if its owner consents.}
>
>
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-May/006393.html
>
>
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
shall create a new
order of the same type for that player to satisfy the difference in the
number of stocks at the original price per stock.
24. E. Following this E shall request support for the reconciliation from
SEC members.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
curance.
30. Negotiation between players for rate of exchange between shares with a
certain symbol and SMDs is unregulated except
neither player may offer any consideration other than a number of shares
or SMDs.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my statement should satisfy CFJ 712 as unambiguous enough to refer to em.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nouncements via
separate emails and having the second arrive first.
However, I'm not the judge on the CFJ (yet).
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ayers to assist them.
C. Engage in contact with new players to ensure a positive experience.
There now this should provide for an office for greeters and ensure they
have the proper obligations.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ced to the concept of
> > Nomic in a similar way, through playing a game of dots (a nomicified
> > version of the type of dots game you play where you make squares for
> > points) at school.
> >
>
> A game of nomic, presumably.
>
> ehird
>
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nsible for assisting new
players and shall make frequent contact with new players to
assure a positive playing experience.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nomic Wiki after finding out about nomic and tried one game in person.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because it wasn't well enough thought through, that's why i made sure it was
not a proposal.
I figured the patent title would let it be only semi-official and allow for
multiple greeters. I was under the impression only one player could fill an
office.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems like your proposal should say with Agoran Consent where it says
without.
Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran
consent.
Unless I missed a rule where CAN = cannot this would mean at any time a
player could simply declare a chamber as not a chamber.
so sho
ed as
necessary to ensure that all holders of that office shall also have the
title and all players not holding that office shall not have the title.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
no relation that I know of
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Welcome to Agora! Any relation to ais523?
>
> -root
>
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand now.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on is does the SLR contain all rules that would apply in the absence
of any contracts or anything like that.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
25 matches
Mail list logo
