On 11/25/24 6:15 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 15:06 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
I vote FOR on 9195.
The previous sentence is a fingerprint.
I note that 4st violated Rule 2471 in this message by claiming that the
sentence "I vote FOR o
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 25, 2024, at 18:16, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> This clearly does not describe the
> sentence in question, which is a perfectly ordinary sentence that anyone
> might reasonably create by attempting to convey its meaning, without
> knowled
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 16:09 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
> > 9195~ Mischief, Kate, Janet 1.0 Commitment Issues
>
> AGAINST. There is never any check that the purported kind of document
> matches reality.
Isn't that the very next sentence? "If the statemen
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 12:49 -0300, juan via agora-official wrote:
> Having been having technical difficulties, I'll try again by Bcc'ing instead
> of Cc'ing the players.
>
> For each of the followingly listed names, I intend to deregister em without 3
> objections.
>
> * cuddlybanana
> * nix
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
