"The following Patent Devices CAN be awarded by the indicated
Officers with 2 Agoran consent. "
Hello, I would like to trade Stamps. The super-exclusive Yupay Stamp is a
gorgeous, deluxe ware; which I believe a number of you may find attractive
to own. I offer the following:
- I offer 1 Yupay Stamp for 1 Stamp that only up to 2 active Players
currently own.
- I offer 1 Yupay Stamp for 3 Stam
On 3/19/23 16:48, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
I vote FOR 8935. I'm not too sure I should, but it just seems exciting to
do.
I vote PRESENT 8935. I don't think I understand yet the full consequences
of these changes.
I'm guessing one of these was meant to be 8934.
--
nix
Prime M
@Ais: I see it now, thank you very much.
And some tardy replies:
@Kerim: Thanks! I've implemented those ideas. Yes, it has got archives for
past rolls.
@Juan: Your site is definitely more rigourous than mine but it look me a
bit to learn to navigate it. For playability purposes I'd rather go wi
On 3/19/23 15:40, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
Including the SHOULDs also opens this up to not just be a system that
punishes players, but potentially everyone.
This is meant to say "not just *officers*, but everyone".
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
Here's a proto for a type of honor that would replace infractions. Honor
can be given or taken only for limited reasons. High honor (+3 in the
proposal) grants you a blot-b-gone, and low honor (-3 in the proposal)
grants you a blot. The valid reasons include the existing infractions as
well as
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 11:40 -0700, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
discussion wrote:
> On Thursday, March 16, 2023, Janet Cobb wrote:
> > Don't use a "MUST" to impose effectiveness requirements upon an
> > action.
> - Unfortunately this isn't evident to me either. Why?
If the requirements aren't met,
- Alright, I could replace it with "Winnor Winnor".
- I appreciate the feedback but, why?
- Unfortunately this isn't evident to me either. Why?
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/16/23 18:18, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-di
søn. 19. mar. 2023 kl. 10:52 skrev Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
> ...
> Title: Oh come on guys folks
> ...
Sad. Guys was supposed to be ~~struck out~~ (like folks was a correction),
but I didn't realize the mailing list didn't support this. Oh well.
--
4s
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:33 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> I intend to, with 2 agoran consent, impeach the referee. (I should be
> properly elected.)
Also, some context from Discord (since context-free support for
impeachment may seem unfair):
>
> 4st — Today at 9:20 AM
> Hmm tho
10 matches
Mail list logo
