Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 10/5/21 22:22, Shy Owl via agora-discussion wrote: >> Yeah, you definitely shouldn't blot yourself. >> -- >> R. Lee > I'm pleased that it's possible though. > > Seems that that sentence wasn't intended to be > used for self-blotting, but I like that I can. > > Seems appropriate somehow. > > -- >

RE: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread Shy Owl via agora-discussion
> Yeah, you definitely shouldn't blot yourself. > -- > R. Lee I'm pleased that it's possible though. Seems that that sentence wasn't intended to be used for self-blotting, but I like that I can. Seems appropriate somehow. -- Fickle Owl

DIS: Re: BUS: Unsuspicious Apathy Intent

2021-10-05 Thread Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: I object Hm. If I am right about how the scam works, and Jason understands it the same way, then the actions of you two suggest to me that you are colluding. Greetings, Ørjan. On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:49 +1100, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote: > Ais523 is wrong btw, although the Referee (currently vacant) punishes > rule violations, anyone can give themselves blots for any reason, > which sadly means you do get 2 blots here. You misinterpreted me here: I think that th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 14:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > On 10/5/2021 2:18 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote: > > One other thing to note is that golfed rule text can be quite hard to > > read and understand, which might not be great for easing new players > > into the game; b

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 10/5/2021 2:18 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote: >> 8613* Jason, Trigon 3.0 The Name of the Win Cards v2 > AGAINST (just a personal preference vote, I don't think this breaks > anything, and think new names might be helpful to avoid the "V" clash, > but don't like the choice o

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 10/5/2021 2:29 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: >> 8617& nix, G. 1.0 Forgiveness > PRESENT: Need context. Context is that while the Fugitive list has been in the Scroll for a long time, it was never official and is somewhat inaccurate for being not maintained t

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 22:29 +0100, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: > > ID Author(s) AITitle > > > > 8607* Telna, ais523, Alexis 3.0 Asset Self-Ratification Fix > PRESENT. Can’t form an opinion abou

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread Shy Owl via agora-discussion
> You made two mistakes here, which fortunately end up cancelling each > other out: but I thought it was worth warning you in case you make them > in the future. > -- > ais523 Aha, thank you for catching these and pointing them out! I am pleased That I was able to misinterpret the rules in such a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8607-8629

2021-10-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 14:55 -0500, Shy Owl via agora-business wrote: > > I pledge to not change my vote on this referendum hereafter. > > I retract my ballot. > > I give myself 2 blots for breaking my above pledge. > > I rename myself Fickle Owl for the rest of the day and > am going to spend so

DIS: Re: BUS: Just in Case

2021-10-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 12:44 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > I intend, with 4 support from other players who own at least 2 types > of ribbon, to start a Rank 2 Festival. I do not yet support, but I agree that it's worth keeping an eye on the situation, and may well support in the nea

Re: DIS: Mis-Citation for CFJ in FLR

2021-10-05 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 10/5/21 05:48, Shy Owl via agora-discussion wrote: > Hi I believe I have found a citation error in the current FLR. > > In the annotations for Rule 1742/23, CFJ 3869 is listed as: > > { > > CFJ 3869 (called 18 Jul 2020): A contract cannot automatically create > another contract, because the

DIS: Mis-Citation for CFJ in FLR

2021-10-05 Thread Shy Owl via agora-discussion
Hi I believe I have found a citation error in the current FLR. In the annotations for Rule 1742/23, CFJ 3869 is listed as: { CFJ 3869 (called 18 Jul 2020): A contract cannot automatically create another contract, because the new contract would not have been made in a public message. }