On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:20 AM Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:28 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 4/25/2020 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > >>> ===
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 16:20 Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider. I agree
> with the judge's verdict, but Warrigal's objections are sufficiently
> significant that they deserve an response on the re
On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 18:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/2/2020 4:03 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> > For each of the following players, I intend, with notice, to flip eir
> > instance of the Master switch to Agora.
> > * Tcbapo (last public message February 7)
> > *
On 5/6/2020 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:28 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 4/25/2020 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> === CFJ 3828
>> ==
On 5/6/2020 12:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 5/6/2020 12:12 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
>> 3. Therefore, if a rule says "a player earns a coin" but does not say who,
>> then Rule 217 calls on us to apply its four factors to answer the question
>> of who earns the coin.
>
> Ok -
On 5/6/2020 12:12 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020, 14:36 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Is indeterminacy a concept in mathematical logic? I've never heard of it.
>
I think the closest mathematical equivalent is whatever term you use when
you have 3 unknowns and only
On 5/6/2020 12:12 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> 3. Therefore, if a rule says "a player earns a coin" but does not say who,
> then Rule 217 calls on us to apply its four factors to answer the question
> of who earns the coin.
Ok - I've got another set of counter-counter argument
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 15:12 -0400, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> 3. Therefore, if a rule says "a player earns a coin" but does not say who,
> then Rule 217 calls on us to apply its four factors to answer the question
> of who earns the coin.
For what it's worth, I accept the argument
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 14:36 Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/6/2020 10:44 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> > You seem to be saying that it's possible for a value to be unambiguous
> > despite being indeterminate. That sounds impossible
On 5/6/2020 10:44 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> You seem to be saying that it's possible for a value to be unambiguous
> despite being indeterminate. That sounds impossible to me; that obviously
> contradicts the meaning of the word "unambiguous".
Ambiguous and indeterminate are
G., you're making some interesting arguments.
Here's how I see things, first of all.
Let's suppose the rules say that a particular switch has two possible
values, A and B. To me, there are three possible situations here.
The first situation is that it is clear which value the switch has. In this
On 5/6/2020 4:56 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020, 01:29 Rebecca wrote:
>
>> Indeterminacy is different to "ambiguity". The indeterminacy here arises
>> from the inability to determine the location of a certain game asset,
>> rather than lack of clarity in the text of the rules of t
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 01:29 Rebecca via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Indeterminacy is different to "ambiguity". The indeterminacy here arises
> from the inability to determine the location of a certain game asset,
> rather than lack of clarity in the text of the rule
13 matches
Mail list logo
