On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM AIS523--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 16:54 -0500, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract
> > does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any other entity. This
>
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 16:54 -0500, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract
> does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any other entity. This
> contract cannot be amended to remove this paragraph or to add any
> provision
{{{
## Bylaw 1: Definition
This contract is named "the Dragon Corporation". The purpose of the
Dragon Corporation is to earn as much money as possible for its
shareholders.
All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract
does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any oth
{{{
This contract is named "the Zombie Market".
Any entity CAN become a party to this contract by announcement. Any
party to this contract CAN cease to be a party to this contract by
announcement, unless e is the master of a zombie and does not own that
zombie's Talisman.
For each zombie whose m
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 14:57, Tanner Swett via agora-business
wrote:
> > 8341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person
> AGAINST; I don't see the purpose of this, and it's confusing for "With
> 2 Support" to technically mean "with 3 supporters, but you count as a
> supporter".
>
> —W
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 10:43 Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Did we ever get the results from the blackjack game? I think at least
> one person won their hand.
>
Yowch, it looks like I botched sending the final result message. I've sent
that now.
—Warri
On 2/15/2020 9:28 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-official wrote:
>
> =0 Falsifian
> =0 ATMunn
>
Minor note: I tended to keep 0s on the list for the first report or two
after they became 0s (so it was clear that they had changed recently in
case anyone wanted to doubt the entries) then drop t
On 2/15/2020 9:59 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
>
> These fines are, collectively, forgivable. Alexis CAN, in a timely
> fashion, expunge 2 blots from emself by publishing a formal apology of
> at least 200 words and including the words "shambolic", "muddlement",
> "sanity", "h
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
wrote:
> I pay 1000 coins to win the game.
>
> -twg
Can someone confirm for me that this is in fact the only outstanding
win I have to resolve? I have lost track XD.
-Alexis
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 12:50, James Cook via agora-business
wrote:
>
> > On February 8, twg and Falsifian were awarded the title of
> > Champion, categorized as Renaissance and High Score,
> > respectively. twg was awarded Associate of Nomi
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:28, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2/14/20 2:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> >> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> > Conditional: AGAINST if Jason votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT.
> > Undeniably a good idea, but I c
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:04, James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> As I pointed out in response to Murphy's "Fix Auctions" proposal, I
> don't think it works, because master is secured at power 2.
>
> How about this one?
Still no mechanism by which Agora does it.
On 2/15/20 9:39 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
>> Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise P
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
> Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. I
> don't object in principle, but, I mean, you didn't _hav
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:51 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > "Without objection" and "without objections" both sound okay to me. I
> > prefer the first, but I don't know why. Maybe I'm just used to it.
>
> The second makes it sound like there need to be objection/s/, plural, to
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
