DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8266-8274

2019-11-11 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: // ID: 8266 Title: Glitter Adoption index: 1.0 Author: nch Co-authors: Enact a Power-1 rule titled "Glitter" with the following text { If a player has earned a ribbon in the past 7 days

Re: DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 5:37 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: So, next question: Do we have anyone who has the technical knowhow/resources to set up a server and the willingness to give trusted Agorans shell access to it? :) -Aris I'll think about this. I've got an old broken laptop sitting around that I'd be

Re: DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:08 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > On 11/11/19 3:04 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > A bit off topic, but thought of creating a new Agoran MUD a little over a > > year ago. I worked on it for a few days before giving up on it for a lack > > of time. If someone is interested, I could

Re: DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 3:04 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: A bit off topic, but thought of creating a new Agoran MUD a little over a year ago. I worked on it for a few days before giving up on it for a lack of time. If someone is interested, I could transfer it over to our GitHub and it could turn into a wider co

Re: DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:40 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 11/11/2019 7:03 AM, Sgeo wrote: > > Was looking through my email archives for LambdaMOO stuff, and saw > > something about an Agoran MOO that used to exist. Is the database for > that > > available anywhere? I would love to explore it

Re: DIS: Draft: Contract Patency

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 2:38 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Alright, a couple scams here. 1) Publish multiple documents, each with the header "this might be the text/parties list of a contract:"; that way there's still some degree of uncertainty. I hadn’t thought of that. Do you have any ideas about how to prev

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:44 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 11/11/2019 5:58 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 11/11/19 8:53 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > >> Until just before you registered, the default voting strength was 1 > (still > >> with a maximum of 5). We increased it because it meant 3 blots

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 2:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On 11/11/2019 5:58 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: On 11/11/19 8:53 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Until just before you registered, the default voting strength was 1 (still with a maximum of 5). We increased it because it meant 3 blots was enough to totally nullif

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 11/11/2019 5:58 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: On 11/11/19 8:53 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Until just before you registered, the default voting strength was 1 (still with a maximum of 5). We increased it because it meant 3 blots was enough to totally nullify your vote, which seemed punitive. -t

Re: DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 11/11/2019 7:03 AM, Sgeo wrote: > Was looking through my email archives for LambdaMOO stuff, and saw > something about an Agoran MOO that used to exist. Is the database for that > available anywhere? I would love to explore it and see what people made, > even if it's otherwise dead. I built

Re: DIS: Draft: Contract Patency

2019-11-11 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 6:37 AM Jason Cobb wrote: > On 11/11/19 1:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > -- > > Title: Contract Patency > > Adoption index: 3.0 > > Author: Aris > > Co-authors: > > > > > > Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full: > >A person is deemed to have consented to an acti

DIS: Agoran MOO?

2019-11-11 Thread Sgeo
Was looking through my email archives for LambdaMOO stuff, and saw something about an Agoran MOO that used to exist. Is the database for that available anywhere? I would love to explore it and see what people made, even if it's otherwise dead.

Re: DIS: Draft: Contract Patency

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 1:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: -- Title: Contract Patency Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full: A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if: 1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated, and not subsequent

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 8:53 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Until just before you registered, the default voting strength was 1 (still with a maximum of 5). We increased it because it meant 3 blots was enough to totally nullify your vote, which seemed punitive. -twg Oh god, that seems very harsh. And I gu

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] November Zombie Auction

2019-11-11 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Monday, November 11, 2019 1:54 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 12:52 AM, James Cook > wrote: > > > I initiate a zombie auction, with the following single lot: > > > > 1. Jacob Arduino > > I bid 1 coin. ...dammit, I'm a few hours past the deadline. -twg

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Monday, November 11, 2019 1:36 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > Did we increase the base? The most recent SLR still says the default is > 3, and I found no proposals since then that increased it, but I could be > missing something. Until just before you registered, the default voting strength was 1 (st

Re: DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/11/19 3:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: Title: Voting Strength Cap Increase Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Aris Co-author(s): Amend Rule 2422, "Voting Strength", by changing the text "The voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision is an integer between 0 and 5 inclusive" to read "The voti

DIS: Random Small Protos

2019-11-11 Thread Aris Merchant
Title: Generic Petitions Adoption index: 1.5 Author: Aris Co-author(s): Amend Rule 649, "Patent Titles", by removing the paragraph: If a player publicly petitions that the Herald award a patent title to another player for a specified reason, the Herald SHALL respond in a timely fashion by e