Here's a draft that separates out contracts from pacts, and creates an
office of Notary to track contracts and pledges. NOTE: Volunteers are
needed for Notary! Apply now!
Changes:
- Fiddles around a bit with the definition of consent, allowing
consent by contract and without objection (if the latt
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:28 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 11/10/19 7:24 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > This seems like an inconsistency in your arguments. The "on Tuesdays"
> > clause is imported, but the "by its owner" clause isn't? They're servi
On 11/10/19 7:24 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
This seems like an inconsistency in your arguments. The "on Tuesdays" clause is imported,
but the "by its owner" clause isn't? They're serving exactly the same syntactic purpose
in exactly the same structure.
While they may have the same gra
---
Nch
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:22 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 11/10/19 7:19 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > Or better yet:
> >
> > > Rule 2577/Y
> > > Asset Actions [Excerpt]
> > > An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announc
On 11/10/19 7:19 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
Or better yet:
Rule 2577/Y
Asset Actions [Excerpt]
An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announcement
on Tuesdays to another entity, subject to modification by its
backing document.
Would you argue that someone could do it by
On 11/10/19 7:17 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
I have a question about this hypothetical version:
Rule 2577/X
Asset Actions [Excerpt]
An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announcement
subject to modification by its backing document. This can only be
done by its owner.
Wo
---
Nch
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:17 PM, Nch wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, November 10, 2019 5:49 PM, Jason Cobb jason.e.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On 11/10/19 8:49 AM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> > > What I don't unde
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 5:49 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 11/10/19 8:49 AM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand about these arguments is that, no matter how you
> > parse "by announcement", the 2577 text immediately modifies "by
> >
On 11/10/19 8:49 AM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
What I don't understand about these arguments is that, no matter how you parse "by announcement",
the 2577 text immediately modifies "by announcement" with "by its owner". So no matter
what the other conditions are, only the owner can perform
On 11/10/19 6:18 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
String is
a chunkstring switch, with possible values of sets of persons, defaulting to
the empty set. Whenever a chunkstring is created in someone's possession, or
transfered to some
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 3:16 PM, Nch via agora-business
wrote:
> (I cut the Turnips out for now because I think they need to be more carefully
> considered to be balanced and interesting.)
>
> I submit the following proposal, stylized according to the Promotor
> style-guide draft (unless m
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 10:06 PM, Jason Cobb
wrote:
> On 11/9/19 7:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > > Rather, I think that this clause does definition-by-properties of "by
> > > announcement", where it ascribes properties to a phrase, but doesn't
> > > give
12 matches
Mail list logo
