---
Nch
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 6:22 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/19 7:19 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > Or better yet:
> >
> > > Rule 2577/Y
> > > Asset Actions [Excerpt]
> > > An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announcement
> > > on Tuesdays to another entity, subject to modification by its
> > > backing document.
> > > Would you argue that someone could do it by announcement any day because
> > > "by announcement" in 478 doesn't restrict the day? Or would you agree
> > > that restricts the "by announcement" to Tuesdays?
>
> I would argue that my scam would only work on Tuesdays, since on
> non-Tuesdays, there is no entity that CAN perform the action by
> announcement, so the action CANNOT be performed by announcement, so
> R478's clause doesn't attach.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Jason Cobb
This seems like an inconsistency in your arguments. The "on Tuesdays" clause is
imported, but the "by its owner" clause isn't? They're serving exactly the same
syntactic purpose in exactly the same structure.
