Re: DIS: Proto: review period

2019-11-01 Thread Gaelan Steele
We used to have the same system—the Promotor COULD start a decision on any proposal, but was PROHIBITED to do so on non-pended ones. AFIAK, people were happy with that system. Gaelan > On Nov 1, 2019, at 12:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > That replaces ossification with a situation where pla

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3778 Assigned to omd

2019-11-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:58 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > Called by G.: 16 Aug 2015 10:39:23 > > Assigned to scshunt:17 Aug 2015 18:01:47 > > scshunt recused:25 May 2017 > > Assigned to o:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3778 Assigned to omd

2019-11-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:42 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: > > > Possible relevant: CFJ 3452 [0]. > > > > [0]: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3452 > > The quoting of Rule 1728/33 in that case doesn't seem contain the blank > lines that the arg

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3778 Assigned to omd

2019-11-01 Thread Jason Cobb
On 11/1/19 6:15 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: On 11/1/19 6:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: ===  CFJ 3778 ===    Changing B to C, or vice versa, is "generally insignificant" under    Rule 2429. Possible relevant: CFJ 3452 [0]. [0]: https://

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3778 Assigned to omd

2019-11-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote: Possible relevant: CFJ 3452 [0]. [0]: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3452 The quoting of Rule 1728/33 in that case doesn't seem contain the blank lines that the arguments talk about... Greetings, Ørjan.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8253-8264

2019-11-01 Thread James Cook
This announcement had the wrong version of the text for 8259. Gaelan replaced eir proposal twice; the second time was an email dated 2019-10-23 00:22 UTC. On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 06:31, Aris Merchant wrote: > // > ID: 8259 > Title

Re: DIS: Proto: review period

2019-11-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Gaelan Steele wrote: { Amend rule 2350 “Proposals” as follows: * replace “A player CAN create a proposal by announcement“ with “A player CAN create a proposal With 23 Hours Notice.” * after the list, add a new paragraph: “Additionally, a player CAN, but SHALL NOT, create a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3776 Assigned to twg

2019-11-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 10/31/2019 5:05 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: On Thursday, October 24, 2019 3:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: The below CFJ is 3776. I assign it to twg. Sorry, I know I'm slightly behind on this - was planning to get it done yesterday but didn't get time. Will publish a judgement on Saturday a