This announcement had the wrong version of the text for 8259. Gaelan
replaced eir proposal twice; the second time was an email dated
2019-10-23 00:22 UTC.
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 06:31, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8259
> Title: Clean up your own mess, without making a bigger one
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Gaelan
> Co-authors: Jason Cobb
>
>
> Remove the following paragraph from Rule 2139 “The Registrar”: {
> The Registrar is also responsible for tracking any switches,
> defined in a rule, that would otherwise lack an officer to track
> them, unless the switch is defined as untracked.
> }
>
> Create a power-1 rule titled “Switch Responsibility” with the following text:
> {
> For each switch which would otherwise lack an officer to track it, and is
> not defined as untracked, there exists an imposed office named
> “Tracker of [switch name]” that is responsible for tracking that switch.
> }
>
> [1006/44 states:
> When a proposal takes effect and creates a new office, if the
> proposal does not specify otherwise, the author of that proposal
> becomes the holder of the office.
>
> I think this works, but we might need to clarify the meaning of
> “creates a new office” to be sure.]
--
- Falsifian
