Hello all!
OOC: I technically have everything ready, and could start the
tournament literally right now. That said, I'm going to be driving
home from a vacation tomorrow, and wouldn't have the time to get
things started properly. So I'm thinking to wait till tomorrow
evening.
IC: Agora is shroude
Here's a draft. While I obviously can't declare a deadline under the
current rules, it would be highly appreciated if people could refrain
from changing things for the next 24 hours or so.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, a
On 8/2/19 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
[This is only a draft.]
Sorry if this way too long (I could probably trim it down a bit if
necessary), but I did my best to cover all the ground that needs to be
covered.
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I should probably clarify: I'm asking for feedback. Does
[This is only a draft.]
Sorry if this way too long (I could probably trim it down a bit if
necessary), but I did my best to cover all the ground that needs to be
covered.
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I will begin by reading into the record this message from G. ([0]):
A little gratuitous for CF
On 8/2/19 9:03 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
The rule does not explicitly specify an agent, nor does it say that to
ratify a public document is to cause the changes to the gamestate (in
which case I would agree with you).
Clarification: the Rules do not say that the performance of the
ratification i
On 8/2/19 9:03 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I think the Ossification judgement should address what it means to make a single rule
"change," as opposed to multiple rule changes. That would help us know what it
would mean for an arbitrary rule change to be IMPOSSIBLE.
In particular, i would like to kno
On 8/2/19 8:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> === CFJ 3761
===
>
> A party to the contract in evidence CAN create a gift by some
> method.
>
>
==
Judgemen
I think the Ossification judgement should address what it means to make a
single rule "change," as opposed to multiple rule changes. That would help us
know what it would mean for an arbitrary rule change to be IMPOSSIBLE.
In particular, i would like to know: if I can draft a single new rule th
A little gratuitous for CFJ 3765-3766:
It's likely that an "arbitrary rule change" can be made by first
making other rule changes to remove any impediments, and then making the
arbitrary change. However, in judging whether some kind of change is
POSSIBLE, we judge based on the current ruleset
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:14 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> How exactly would the Rules specify different methods of victory? I've
> seen that Victory Conditions were a thing in the past, but they don't
> exist any more.
It's ultimately up to the Herald's discretion and some degree of
consensus, but the "
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 14:56 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:17 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
> wrote:
> > A bug exploit could /be/ a win as intended, if the bug had been
> > placed there intentionally by the proposer. "Convince people to
> > adopt a buggy victory condition and w
On 8/2/19 4:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:17 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
A bug exploit could /be/ a win as intended, if the bug had been placed
there intentionally by the proposer. "Convince people to adopt a buggy
victory condition and win immediately" is one of t
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:17 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
> A bug exploit could /be/ a win as intended, if the bug had been placed
> there intentionally by the proposer. "Convince people to adopt a buggy
> victory condition and win immediately" is one of the more common
> winning techniques a
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 14:02 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Actually, I wonder if we should think about some kind of "debugging"
> mechanism for victories. Something like "when a win method is first
> implemented (some mechanism, probably involving Agoran Consent, for
> figuring out whether the first
On 8/2/19 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Fair point, and it's a matter of preference. This just seemed a bit
experimental for a full win mechanism to me.
Actually, I wonder if we should think about some kind of "debugging"
mechanism for victories. Something like "when a win method is first
impleme
> > Fair point, and it's a matter of preference. This just seemed a bit
> > experimental for a full win mechanism to me.
Actually, I wonder if we should think about some kind of "debugging"
mechanism for victories. Something like "when a win method is first
implemented (some mechanism, probably i
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:48 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Aris wrote:
> > > * I'd prefer an award of coins along with a SHOULD encouraging the Herald
> > > to give the patent title of "Time Lord"
> >
> > Every other subgame has "win = Champion
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:49 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> 8/2/19 4:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Does this do the trick?
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > ---
> > CoE: The last Proposal Pool left out several proposals.
> >
> > Accepted. Revision: At ~20:45:03 UTC Jul 28, when the last
> > non-revision proposal
>
On 7/31/19 11:04 AM, James Cook wrote:
Whenever a player has not done so in the past 4 days, e CAN
Commune with the Wheel by unconditional announcement, specifying
Rock, Paper or Scissors. A player CAN Reach into the Past by
unconditional announcement at any time. If
8/2/19 4:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Does this do the trick?
-Aris
---
CoE: The last Proposal Pool left out several proposals.
Accepted. Revision: At ~20:45:03 UTC Jul 28, when the last
non-revision proposal
pool report was published, the proposal pool contained the following
proposals:
Au
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Aris wrote:
> > * I'd prefer an award of coins along with a SHOULD encouraging the Herald
> > to give the patent title of "Time Lord"
>
> Every other subgame has "win = Champion" (method of win could be noted
> as "Time Lord"). But not sure wh
Aris wrote:
> * I'd prefer an award of coins along with a SHOULD encouraging the Herald
> to give the patent title of "Time Lord"
Every other subgame has "win = Champion" (method of win could be noted
as "Time Lord"). But not sure why we'd have a special-coded patent
title for what's basically a
Does this do the trick?
-Aris
---
CoE: The last Proposal Pool left out several proposals.
Accepted. Revision: At ~20:45:03 UTC Jul 28, when the last non-revision proposal
pool report was published, the proposal pool contained the following proposals:
Author(s)AITitle
---
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:04 AM James Cook wrote:
> > That's a good point. Maybe we could add "as long as the announcement
> > is not conditioned on anything". It's possible that R478's requirement
> > that "by announcement" actions must be unambiguous would imply this
> > anyway.
> >
> > --
> >
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 8/1/2019 8:59 AM, James Cook wrote:
> > Note: The previous monthly report incorrectly listed the deregistration
> > dates of 天火狐 and pokes as January 2019. The correct month is February
> > 2019, as listed in this report.
>
> Can you list Ten
25 matches
Mail list logo
