Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank Heist

2018-10-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
It is no longer a contract, because no one agrees to it, which is basic to the definition of "contract". So it cannot own assets. On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Very nice! I believe this would work if there were anything in the rules to > suggest that a terminated contract ca

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank Heist

2018-10-11 Thread Aris Merchant
Terminated contracts don’t exist. Nonexistent entities can’t own assets. -Aris On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:19 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Very nice! I believe this would work if there were anything in the rules > to suggest that a terminated contract cannot own assets. :) > > -twg > > > ‐‐

DIS: Re: BUS: Bank Heist

2018-10-11 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Very nice! I believe this would work if there were anything in the rules to suggest that a terminated contract cannot own assets. :) -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, October 11, 2018 11:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote: > > > I have sent

Re: DIS: Herald's after-action report

2018-10-11 Thread Reuben Staley
Perhaps we could call a CFJ about the set vs. individual interpretations and then, if set is chosen, we could call another one about clusivity. A potential wording for the first would be "All players could have won by announcement under rule 2580" and one for the second could be "VJ Rada, D Ma

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

2018-10-11 Thread Reuben Staley
You failed to judge a CFJ on time a few months ago when you were leaving. The current justice system has a tendency to continue to punish you for crimes that happened in the distant past. On 10/11/2018 07:17 PM, ATMunn wrote: I expunge 1 blot from myself. (when did I get that, anyways?) On 10

Re: DIS: [Proto] Let Me Back In!

2018-10-11 Thread Reuben Staley
We need to discuss this if this is going to be a major part of Agora soon so I suppose I'll start. On 10/07/2018 08:45 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Here's a minimally patched proto of Alexis's Politics system. I'm undoubtedly missing something, so any corrections would be appreciated. Also, I've le

Re: DIS: Herald's after-action report

2018-10-11 Thread D Margaux
I think this is an admirably clear way to put it. I personally had in mind the set/inclusive interpretation. The “individual” interpretation would make each slate’s winning chances depend in part upon which slates happen to have impure players. That seems undesirable to me, because the player