On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Also, how often do you say "Bring me two papers"? It's
> usually pieces or sheets, but not papers. The main time you'd hear a number
> of papers is when talking about papers submitted to a conference or
> journal, not for mere physical sheets.
What if e
Actually, this feels a bit weird, but I don't see why it's unethical
so... I'll pay whoever calls it a coin for the trouble. I'd also like
to point out that AFAICT, CFJs have been literally free (as well as
unpaid) since the adoption of P8014.
Justification: The game has a legitimate interest in s
Good point. We should probably change paper to be singular to be consistent
with the other uncountable currencies, then.
Gaelan
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 10:56 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> Need was inaccurate. TBH, I'm not sure how often we'd use them. But it
> would be a nice touch if the sys
Need was inaccurate. TBH, I'm not sure how often we'd use them. But it
would be a nice touch if the system is going to last a while, which it
looks like it will. Also, how often do you say "Bring me two papers"? It's
usually pieces or sheets, but not papers. The main time you'd hear a number
of pap
The issue really calls for interpretation. I would call the CFJ myself, but
I'm far too intrested in judging it. :) I think I have some ideas for a
ruling which would clarify the issue, set out some new interesting
precedent, and generally not make anyone too grouchy. If anyone would care
to use th
Papers are already defined as plural in the rules, so probably don’t need the
count noun. As for the rest, they make sense (although I’m not sure how often
we’d actually need them—“I transfer 3 fabric” works fine)
Gaelan
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 6:07 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The follo
>
> The following abbreviations are used in the table above:
> Ston = stone
> Appl = apples
> Lmbr = lumber
> Cotn = cotton
> Coin = coins
> Papr = papers
> Fabr = fabric
Some of these probably need (or could use) count nouns. Proto:
Shards of stone
Logs of lumber
Bales of cotton
Sheets of paper
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > I object to every one of the below intents.
>
> I'm wondering what is needed for you to be considered to have fulfilled the
> monthly requirement and whether your objections violate it.
>
>In the f
I favor the CFJ, if this gets that far.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:56 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Wait, what does “attempt” mean? Can the Registrar just say “I deregister
> each of these players by announcement”? It doesn’t work, but it’s arguably
> an intent.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Apr 1, 2018,
Wait, what does “attempt” mean? Can the Registrar just say “I deregister each
of these players by announcement”? It doesn’t work, but it’s arguably an intent.
Gaelan
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 5:42 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> I object to every one of th
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I object to every one of the below intents.
I'm wondering what is needed for you to be considered to have fulfilled
the monthly requirement and whether your objections violate it.
In the first Eastman week of every month the Registrar SHALL
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I retract the proposal “Cross-Polination". (Side note: I have five ribbons,
> so if I did
> have a scam against the proposal process, the festival wouldn’t have helped).
Yeah I counted Ribbons - it was mainly in case your listed BlogNomic coauthors
we
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 16:17 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Now that April Fools Day is over (in UTC, anyway), I would like to
> make clear that I have no intention of voting for this proposal. The
> caution probably warranted, however.
It'd probably make more sense to withdraw the proposal, in that
Oh for the love of the light. Good one, you had me worried there. Are you
actually going to retract it so we can stand down the disruptive anti-scam
measure (e.g. the festival)?
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:17 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Now that April Fools Day is over (in UTC, anyway), I wo
Now that April Fools Day is over (in UTC, anyway), I would like to make clear
that I have no intention of voting for this proposal. The caution probably
warranted, however.
Gaelan
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> Agora’s gr
Aris was at (-1, -1)
CB was at (+1, -1)
I'm sorry I didn't publish reports. I probably should have. I knew
people would get mad eventually because of my tardiness. But I figured
more people would also get mad if I published anything in a report.
Everyone would only get mad at everyone else because
I was still at (-1, -1).
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:54 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to
> update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a
> long time.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cu
Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to
update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long
time.
Gaelan
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I take everything from where I'm standing.
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> > Agora’s great and all, but I think every once and a while we need
> to shake things
> > up. I create the following proposal, and pend it with one paper:
>
> Well might as well test if our curre
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The following players have made no public posts in 30 days. Therefore I
> announce my intent (separate intent announcements for each player) to
> deregister em with 3 Agoran Consent:
Minor clarification: the trigger is "past month" not "past 30 days";
20 matches
Mail list logo
