Re: DIS: (Off-Topic) BlogNomic

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > While the spirit of this idea admirable, I have serious reservations about > calling on Agorans - or on any other group - to register and vote en bloc on > another Nomic. For now - at least - BlogNomic regulars appear to be voting > down

Re: DIS: (Off-Topic) BlogNomic

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Michael Brown wrote: > > I am (unfortunately) a lurker here and, until today, also at Blognomic. So > this is officially unofficial, but I hereby move the following for > consideration by all watchers, lurkers and registered players of Agora: > > WHEREAS, Nomic i

Re: DIS: (Off-Topic) BlogNomic

I am (unfortunately) a lurker here and, until today, also at Blognomic. So this is officially unofficial, but I hereby move the following for consideration by all watchers, lurkers and registered players of Agora: WHEREAS, Nomic is a precious gift to humanity; and WHEREAS, Long running nomics are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:09 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I may have found a bug. (Maybe two?) Nothing very serious, but > I was wondering whether you want to fix it now or amend it out later. > You appear to be trying to give the Ref a higher limit on fin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

I think I may have found a bug. (Maybe two?) Nothing very serious, but I was wondering whether you want to fix it now or amend it out later. You appear to be trying to give the Ref a higher limit on finger pointing than everyone else, but the implementation may not work. It says: "The Referee C

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:33 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:24 AM Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> >>> >>> I believe this is a material change to the proposal. The distributed >>> proposal appears to have a less sensible

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:24 AM Owen Jacobson wrote: >> >> >> I believe this is a material change to the proposal. The distributed >> proposal appears to have a less sensible effect than the original. I would >> tend to interpret the original p

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Identification of Proposal 7820

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:31 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, they are a bit vague. But it's kind of impossible to have a > bright line rule here. Although, if people don't want ambiguity in the > ruleset, my CFJ ruling should have dealt with it. It's going to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Identification of Proposal 7820

On Thursday, November 3, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:55 PM nichdel wrote: >> >> On 10/28/2016 11:18 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >> > ID Author(s) AI Title >> > - >> > 7820^! Alexis, ais

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:24 AM Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I believe this is a material change to the proposal. The distributed > proposal appears to have a less sensible effect than the original. I would > tend to interpret the original proposal as amending the rule in one of two > ways depending

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:16 PM Owen Jacobson > wrote: > > 7823+ Alexis 3.0 Vigilante Justice > > AGAINST, but bring it around again. Aris’ distribution of the proposals > contains a formatting error, wh

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Identification of Proposal 7820

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:55 PM nichdel wrote: > On 10/28/2016 11:18 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > - > > 7820^! Alexis, ais523 1.0 Official Clarification > > > > > I vote AGAINST.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7821-7830

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:16 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: > > 7823+ Alexis 3.0 Vigilante Justice > > AGAINST, but bring it around again. Aris’ distribution of the proposals > contains a formatting error, which I believe modifies the intent of the > proposal. I’m not confident that the rules

Re: DIS: (Off-Topic) BlogNomic

On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Sgeo wrote: > What's going on with BlogNomic? > http://blognomic.com/archive/twelve_times_twelve_midnight > > > Is this just the new theme, risking BlogNomic's existence? I know nothing of BlogNomic, or of

Re: DIS: BUS: Pending

On Oct 30, 2016, at 5:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Thank you! Now let's make sure this doesn't happen again. > > I hereby create the following proposal: > > Title: Promotorial Power > AI: 1 > Author: Aris > { > If the proposal "Make Spending Power More Useful" has passed: { > > Amend rule 24

DIS: Wiki Status

The wiki will be on and off this weekend. We apologize for the inconvenience. ~The Management

DIS: (Off-Topic) BlogNomic

What's going on with BlogNomic? http://blognomic.com/archive/twelve_times_twelve_midnight Is this just the new theme, risking BlogNomic's existence?