I vote as follows:
> > 7818+ ais523 1.0 Make Spending Power More Useful
FOR, on the grounds that the ADoP can remove the Promotor (or at least
start an election) Besides, you can always have a new election, you just
need a lot of support.
>
> > 7819+ Alexis 1.0 Legislating Conventio
On Friday, October 21, 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> Except if G. managed to counterscam...
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
Good point, although the ratification without objection should do it.
Still... G., would you do an Alexian collapse (as I will try to get people
to call it, unless we have a name
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel wrote:
Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in
taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any
questions about your new job, fe
On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel >
> wrote:
> > > Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in
> > > taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any
> > >
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel wrote:
> > Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in
> > taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any
> > questions about your new job, feel free to write me an ema
On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "Make Spending Power More
> Useful"):
>
> In rule 2445, replace the following paragraph:
> {{{
> A player can flip a proposal's imminence to "pending" by
> announcement, unless e has already done
On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 12:11 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 >
> > wrote:
> > > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"):
> > >
> > > Enact a new power-1 rule with the following text:
> > > {{{
> > > A
On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"):
>
> Enact a new power-1 rule with the following text:
> {{{
> A player is on the List if they have ever mentioned the List in a
> public forum or a discussion forum.
> }}}
>
>
> --
> ais523
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 12:11 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523
> wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "The List"):
> >
> > Enact a new power-1 rule with the following text:
> > {{{
> > A player is on the List if they have ever mentioned the List in
On Friday, October 21, 2016, Luis Ressel wrote:
>
> Outcome: Aris
>
> =
>
> Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in
> taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any questions
> about your new job, feel free to write me an email.
>
> --
> aranea
>
Well, tha
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:25 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > Rule 2143 has an exacting standard. It says that the information must
> > be published. A mostly-correct report is not, by its definition,
> > sufficient to fulfill the duties of the office. Therefor
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > Rule 2143 has an exacting standard. It says that the information must
> > be published. A mostly-correct report is not, by its definition,
> > sufficient to fulfill the duties of the office. Therefore aranea h
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Rule 2143 has an exacting standard. It says that the information must
> be published. A mostly-correct report is not, by its definition,
> sufficient to fulfill the duties of the office. Therefore aranea has
> failed to publish the ADoP's report since
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:13 +0200
Luis Ressel wrote:
> Btw, there is a way to immediately force Alexis out of office, if you
> want to prevent him from pending his proposal. However, it's somewhat
> cheaty and would require coordinated activity by three players.
>
> Let's see if someone can fig
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:34:21 +0200
Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending
> > power of all offices Alexis holds (Referee, in this
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100
ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending
> power of all offices Alexis holds (Referee, in this case) to 0, thus
> making the proposal impossible to pend without ou
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> And why would anyone vote for this? What's the loophole you're using? I
> assume we have to wait and see, but unless you have a loophole... Stoping
> this from working may require CFJs, but the damage can be minimized even if
> it passes...
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:44:27 +
Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Would people be interested in a thesis explaining what can be found
> about the various patent titles?
+1
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:13:33 +
Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I award aranea a Green Card for distributing Proposal 7816 which was
> not pending.
Proposal 7816 was pending. Read my distribution message again.
> P.S. Please remember to use Spivak pronouns.
Meh. I usually don't care about that, especi
19 matches
Mail list logo
