On Friday, October 21, 2016, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI 1, "Make Spending Power More
> Useful"):
> {{{{
> In rule 2445, replace the following paragraph:
> {{{
> A player can flip a proposal's imminence to "pending" by
> announcement, unless e has already done so a number of times
> that week that equals or exceeds the total spending power of the
> offices e holds.
> }}}
> with
> {{{
> A player can flip a proposal's imminence by announcement, unless
> e has already done so a number of times that week that equals or
>
> exceeds the total spending power of the offices e holds.
> }}}
> }}}}
>
> (The idea is that if there's some sort of disagreement as to whether a
> proposal is worth pending, players or teams of players can basically
> have a fight flipping the imminence back and forth until one or the
> other has run out of spending power. If the Promotor is involved in the
> fight, e's likely to win, both due to eir high spending power and due
> to eir ability to distribute a proposal immediately after pending it,
> thus denying other players a chance to interfere.)
>
> --
> ais523
>
I second this, and I'm sure our new promotor will like it. Just in case,
can we add 2/3 majority (of all players, it's not ever supposed to
actually happen) overrule?
-Aris
