On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> WHEREAS: The Patent Title Distributor was previously rules-defined
> as belonging to the administrator of the main fora;
>
> and WHEREAS: That particular definition was repealed before the
> current administrator took up eir role;
>
> an
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 13:04 -0700, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > When's the last time one of these was rewarded? It used to be rule
> > defined but hasn't been for quite a while. Considering how many
> > people have probably qualified since but not been awarded on
On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 13:04 -0700, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> When's the last time one of these was rewarded? It used to be rule
> defined but hasn't been for quite a while. Considering how many
> people have probably qualified since but not been awarded one, I
> figured it was just a legacy title at
I support =)
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 11:00 Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > THEREFORE: I CALL FOR SUPPORT and announce my intent (as Herald) to
> > award the Patent Title Distributor to omd, with 2 Agoran Consent.
> >
>
> I support.
On 07/26/2016 08:05 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 10:19 -0500, nichdel wrote:
>> On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> > * Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
>> > earns 1 PP
>> This would also work with the economic proposal that's in progres
On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 03:23 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> Distributing non-pending proposals is possible but illegal, including
> via deputisation (R2160: "as if e held a particular office"). A win
> might be worth some Red/Black Cards, depending, especially as the
> statute of limitations is only
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 10:19 -0500, nichdel wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > * Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
> > earns 1 PP
> This would also work with the economic proposal that's in progress.> author
> would have incentive to pend a
Luis Ressel wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:01:05 +0100
ais523 wrote:
It seems that the Promotor currently has infinite economic power,
which is kind-of problematic.
Not exactly. The Promotor can only distribute pending proposals using
the normal distribution process. And just like everyone e
8 matches
Mail list logo
