On 07/25/2016 06:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
WHEREAS: The Patent Title Distributor was previously rules-defined
as belonging to the administrator of the main fora;
and WHEREAS: That particular definition was repealed before the
current administrator took up eir role;
and WHEREAS: as Patent Ti
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 12:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> > > On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > > > * Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
> > > >earns 1 PP
> > > >
> > > This would al
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 12:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Are numerical Switches inherently ordered?
>
> Probably not, but that doesn't necessarily break anything.
>
> Number theory tends to define with sets (which are unordered on their
> own), but the first-order f
On 07/25/2016 12:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
* Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
earns 1 PP
This would also work with the economic proposal that's in progress.
Papyrii would be ne
On 07/25/2016 12:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Are numerical Switches inherently ordered?
Probably not, but that doesn't necessarily break anything.
Number theory tends to define with sets (which are unordered on their
own), but the first-order functions (namely successor) are also defined
Are numerical Switches inherently ordered?
E.g. in:
Budget is a switch [...] whose legal values are integers
from 0 to the Income Cap inclusive, defaulting to 0.
if a rule says to "add 1" or perform other math to change a Budget
value, does that work as expected?
The "natural swi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > * Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
> > earns 1 PP
> >
>
> This would also work with the economic proposal that's in progress.
> Papyrii would be necessary for pending, and pla
On 07/25/2016 08:34 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> * Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted, the player who pended it
> earns 1 PP
>
This would also work with the economic proposal that's in progress.
Papyrii would be necessary for pending, and players other than the
author would have incentive to
Yes. I propose the following changes:
* Swap the rewards: 3 PP for adoption, 2 PP for distribution
* Cap the maximum amount of PP earnable per week (I'd say 10-20 PP)
* Distribution by expedition doesn't count (the adoption bonus still
applies, though)
* Reward pending: If a proposal is adopted,
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 15:15 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:01:05 +0100
> ais523 wrote:
>
> >
> > It seems that the Promotor currently has infinite economic power,
> > which is kind-of problematic.
> Not exactly. The Promotor can only distribute pending proposals using
> the n
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:01:05 +0100
ais523 wrote:
> It seems that the Promotor currently has infinite economic power,
> which is kind-of problematic.
Not exactly. The Promotor can only distribute pending proposals using
the normal distribution process. And just like everyone else, their
ability t
On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 23:00 -0600, Sprocklem wrote:
> > 7802* ais523 1.0 Promotion Points
> AGAINST. Even if this did work, I think it would be better to tie
> proposal rewards in with some sort of functional currency system.
Back when the proposal was submitted, the only economy we had was
12 matches
Mail list logo
