> > InmytypicalfashionIdeclaremyintenttoregisterinamannerthatiss
lightlyannoyingtoprocessbutthatisstilllegalprovidedthatIamin
terpretingtherulesetcorrectly.
> Welcome back, Ienpw!
Woo, thanks! As always, I hope *this* time I'll be more active!
For what it's worth, I've been closely watching this conversation and just
haven't had any input yet. If there was a moot, I'd likely participate. Until
then I'll continue doing silly things with the rules.
~nichdel
-Original Message-
From: "omd"
Sent: 10/8/2014 3:23 PM
To: "Agora N
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:32 AM, James Beirne wrote:
> InmytypicalfashionIdeclaremyintenttoregisterinamannerthatisslightlyannoyingtoprocessbutthatisstilllegalprovidedthatIaminterpretingtherulesetcorrectly.
Welcome back, Ienpw!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 3. The Rules are truly silent, so it's a matter of "Agoran
> preference" in terms of play style. This makes it a really good
> subject for a Moot ("voting" between two play styles).
I like the general idea of trying out voting on play styles
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > In every other case, when the Rules say "A player must do X to then do
> > Y", and there's no explicit defined way to do X, we say "too bad, no Y".
> > That's the clear custom underlying ISID, and the legalis
5 matches
Mail list logo
