For what it's worth, I've been closely watching this conversation and just
haven't had any input yet. If there was a moot, I'd likely participate. Until
then I'll continue doing silly things with the rules.
~nichdel
-----Original Message-----
From: "omd" <c.ome...@gmail.com>
Sent: 10/8/2014 3:23 PM
To: "Agora Nomic discussions (DF)" <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
Subject: Re: DIS: No more Rights means no informal process?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 3. The Rules are truly silent, so it's a matter of "Agoran
> preference" in terms of play style. This makes it a really good
> subject for a Moot ("voting" between two play styles).
I like the general idea of trying out voting on play styles
(especially since we've had a grand total of one Moot so far, and it
was for an uncontroversial issue); however, when posting my original
intent to Moot I was worried that there weren't enough interested
players to have a particularly meaningful vote. Even after the
upswing in activity in the last few days, I think that might still be
the case...
