Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Encasing one of your ISIDs in an ISIDefine does not prevent it from being > ISID. Also, CFJ 2737. I'm not attempting to do anything that even *resembles* infinite descent. Why do you think I am? CFJ 2737 is irrelevant here, because I am not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > >> Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > >> have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and defin

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Support Democracy Considered No Fun

2012-08-29 Thread ais523
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 19:39 -0400, omd wrote: > Proposal: Support Democracy Considered No Fun (AI=3, Democratic) > > Repeal Rule 2374 (Democratization). Seriously? Writing the proposal to look innocent enough that people don't democratise it is half the fun. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: >> Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I >> have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the >> word "‮raB‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the s

DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the > word "‮raB‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I have already > called a CFJ in this message.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7284-7299

2012-08-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Pavitra wrote: >> 7284 3.0 FKA441344 No Zero Length Reports > FOR unless P7268 is going to pass, in which case AGAINST. I suggest changing this vote. —Machiavelli

DIS: Re: BUS: Banking

2012-08-29 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pavitra wrote: > I transfer a prop from ais523 (because e has the most) to Eileen > (because props are created faster when entities other than first-class > players have some). > Fails. Ownership of props is restricted to first-class players. -scshunt