DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Kick out the Jams, er, Platonists

2012-06-04 Thread comexk
I already submitted proposal 7246, which is roughly equivalent. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Proposal: Kick out the Jams, er, Platonists > (AI = 3; this may have a 1-ruble cost, in which case I pay it) > > Amend Rule 208 (Resolving Agoran decisions) by ap

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Docket

2012-06-04 Thread Ed Murphy
FKA441344 wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: [...] Recent events [...] Mon 28 May 07:52:13 3221 initiated by FKA441344 Fri 1 Jun 23:23:08 3208 judged FALSE by ais523 Sun 3 Jun 00:51:38 BobTHJ registers Sun 3 Jun 17:22:48 3212 assigned to omd Sun 3 Jun 17:24:40 321

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3217-18 assigned to ais523

2012-06-04 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 10:44 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3217 = Criminal Case 3217 = Sun, 27 May 2012 14:14:46 +0100

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3217-18 assigned to ais523

2012-06-04 Thread Tanner Swett
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Pavitra wrote: > No you don't. Either e successfully retracted the case, in which case > you can't possibly re-retract an already-retracted case, or else e > failed to do so, in which "what e just did" is a null action and > therefore you didn't do anything either.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3217-18 assigned to ais523

2012-06-04 Thread Pavitra
No you don't. Either e successfully retracted the case, in which case you can't possibly re-retract an already-retracted case, or else e failed to do so, in which "what e just did" is a null action and therefore you didn't do anything either. On 06/03/2012 09:01 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote: > I do